2007 Ford Edge vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2007 Ford Edge is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Edge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Edge (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Edge should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Edge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Edge (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Edge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Edge | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Edge | EJ |
Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |