2007 Ford Edge vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford Edge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford Edge would be higher.
Because 2007 Ford Edge is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Edge will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 381 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Edge. (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Edge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford Edge | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Edge | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5612 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1987 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1598 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 100 L |
