2007 Ford Expedition vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2007 Ford Expedition is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2007 Ford Expedition. (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Expedition. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 559 kg more than 2007 Ford Expedition. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Expedition. (495 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Expedition.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Expedition | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Expedition | Armada |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 106 L |