2007 Ford F-150 vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2007 Ford F-150 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford F-150 (202 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Because 2007 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford F-150 (353 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford F-150 | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | F-150 | 400 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2560 mm |