2007 Ford Fusion vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2007 Ford Fusion is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Fusion (221 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2007 Ford Fusion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Fusion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Fusion (278 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford Fusion | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Fusion | EJ |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
