2007 Ford Ikon vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford Ikon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford Ikon would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ikon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ikon. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ikon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Ikon (110 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2007 Ford Ikon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Ikon | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ikon | Micra |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1050 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 46 L |