2007 Ford Ka vs. 1979 Mazda 929
To start off, 2007 Ford Ka is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda 929 weights approximately 233 kg more than 2007 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda 929 (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Ka | 1979 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | 929 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |