2007 Ford Mondeo vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2007 Ford Mondeo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1974 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Mondeo | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mondeo | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |