2007 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2007 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Mustang (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Mustang weights approximately 941 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Mustang | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Mustang | 102 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2160 mm |