2007 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2007 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2007 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Mustang (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Mustang | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |