2007 Ford Mustang vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2007 Ford Mustang. (207 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Mustang (323 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2007 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Mustang | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Commodore |
Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 323 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |