2007 Ford Ranger vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 376 kg more than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Ranger | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Ford | Humber |
Model | Ranger | Pullman |
Year Released | 2007 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.8:1 | 6.3:1 |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 132 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 3330 mm |