2007 Ford Ranger vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Ranger weights approximately 376 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford Ranger | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | Renown |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2750 mm |
