2007 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Hornet (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Ranger weights approximately 15 kg more than 1953 Hudson Hornet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford Ranger | 1953 Hudson Hornet | |
| Make | Ford | Hudson |
| Model | Ranger | Hornet |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4810 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2990 mm |
