2007 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Plymouth Cambridge
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Plymouth Cambridge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Plymouth Cambridge would be higher. At 3,569 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Plymouth Cambridge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1953 Plymouth Cambridge. (97 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1953 Plymouth Cambridge.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Plymouth Cambridge (237 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1953 Plymouth Cambridge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Ranger | 1953 Plymouth Cambridge | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Ranger | Cambridge |
Year Released | 2007 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 3569 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 7.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2900 mm |