2007 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Ranger weights approximately 495 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 2007 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Ranger | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ranger | Tempest |
Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 6376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2930 mm |