2007 Ford Ranger vs. 1977 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Datsun 280Z (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Datsun 280Z should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1977 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford Ranger | 1977 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Ford | Datsun |
| Model | Ranger | 280Z |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1977 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2304 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |
