2007 Ford Ranger vs. 1981 Seat 127
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 127 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1981 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 127.
Because 2007 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Ranger | 1981 Seat 127 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Ranger | 127 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2230 mm |