2007 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Ranger weights approximately 639 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2007 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2007 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Ranger | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | C 52 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 354 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1266 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2830 mm |