2007 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2007 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 558 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Ranger | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | HRT |
Year Released | 2007 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 815 Nm |
Top Speed | 155 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |