2007 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2007 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU has automatic transmission and 2007 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2007 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford Ranger | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ranger | SSU |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 71 L |
