2007 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Ranger weights approximately 685 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford Ranger | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
