2007 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MPV (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Because 2007 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MPV (260 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford Ranger | 2004 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | MPV |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 75 L |