2007 GMC Acadia vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2007 GMC Acadia is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 GMC Acadia (275 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 GMC Acadia (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 GMC Acadia | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | GMC | Mazda |
| Model | Acadia | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |
