2007 GMC Acadia vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2007 GMC Acadia is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (349 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2007 GMC Acadia. (275 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2007 GMC Acadia.
Because 2007 GMC Acadia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 GMC Acadia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (530 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 GMC Acadia. (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 GMC Acadia.
Compare all specifications:
2007 GMC Acadia | 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Acadia | SL |
Year Released | 2007 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 349 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 530 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 80 L |