2007 GMC Acadia vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2007 GMC Acadia is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 GMC Acadia (276 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 GMC Acadia (340 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2007 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 GMC Acadia | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | GMC | Mazda |
| Model | Acadia | 6 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
