2007 GMC Acadia vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 GMC Acadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 GMC Acadia would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 GMC Acadia (275 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2013 Jaguar XF. (237 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2013 Jaguar XF.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 340 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2007 GMC Acadia | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | GMC | Jaguar |
Model | Acadia | XF |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2909 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |