2007 Holden Commodore vs. 2001 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 166 more horse power than 2001 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2001 Volkswagen Polo.

Because 2007 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volkswagen Polo. (129 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volkswagen Polo. 2001 Volkswagen Polo has automatic transmission and 2007 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2007 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volkswagen Polo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: