2007 Holden Commodore vs. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Colorado. (185 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado (258 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Holden Commodore | 2010 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
| Model | Commodore | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2564 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
