2007 Holden UTE vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2007 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Holden UTE | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Holden | Riley |
| Model | UTE | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 261 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
