2007 Holden UTE vs. 2002 Toyota Pod
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Pod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Pod would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Pod. (194 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Pod.
Because 2007 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Pod (430 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden UTE. (340 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Pod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden UTE. 2002 Toyota Pod has automatic transmission and 2007 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2007 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota Pod will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Holden UTE | 2002 Toyota Pod | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | UTE | Pod |
Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 194 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |