2007 Holden UTE vs. 2003 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 109 more horse power than 2003 Mercury Sable. (152 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercury Sable.

Because 2007 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mercury Sable. (246 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mercury Sable. 2003 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 2007 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2007 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: