2007 Holden UTE vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 180 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Smart. (112 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Holden UTE | 2004 MCC Smart | |
Make | Holden | MCC |
Model | UTE | Smart |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 112 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |