2007 Holden UTE vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden UTE would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 HP) has 159 more horse power than 2007 Holden UTE. (261 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden UTE. (340 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden UTE. 2009 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2007 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2007 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Holden UTE | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | UTE | XF |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 261 HP | 420 HP |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
