2007 Holden UTE vs. 2010 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2010 Nissan Armada is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Armada (317 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2007 Holden UTE. (261 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Armada (521 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden UTE. (340 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden UTE. 2010 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 2007 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2007 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Holden UTE | 2010 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | UTE | Armada |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 261 HP | 317 HP |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 521 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
