2007 Honda Civic vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2007 Honda Civic is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Honda Civic (205 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Honda Civic | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Honda | Rover |
| Model | Civic | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Top Speed | 234 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2630 mm |
