2007 Honda CR-V vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2007 Honda CR-V is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,353 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Honda CR-V | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | CR-V | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2007 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 2353 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |