2007 Honda CR-V vs. 1994 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2007 Honda CR-V is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 2,352 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Honda CR-V (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1994 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Honda CR-V weights approximately 227 kg more than 1994 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Honda CR-V (218 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Honda CR-V | 1994 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Honda | Plymouth |
Model | CR-V | Colt |
Year Released | 2007 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2352 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2530 mm |