2007 Honda CR-V vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2007 Honda CR-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Honda CR-V (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 453 kg more than 2007 Honda CR-V.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Honda CR-V | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CR-V | SSU |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2352 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 166 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 71 L |
