2007 Honda CR-V vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Honda CR-V would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 680 kg more than 2007 Honda CR-V.
Because 2007 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Honda CR-V | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Honda | Rolls-Royce |
Model | CR-V | Phantom |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 6092 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3820 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 100 L |