2007 Honda Element vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2007 Honda Element is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,352 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Honda Element is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Honda Element (166 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Honda Element should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Honda Element (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Honda Element will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. 1982 Nissan Pulsar has automatic transmission and 2007 Honda Element has manual transmission. 2007 Honda Element will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Nissan Pulsar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Honda Element | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | Element | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2007 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2352 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2420 mm |