2007 Honda Jazz vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2007 Honda Jazz is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Honda Jazz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Honda Jazz (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Honda Jazz (143 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2007 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Honda Jazz | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | Jazz | 66 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |