2007 Honda S2000 vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Honda S2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Honda S2000 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 569 more horse power than 2007 Honda S2000. (237 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 2007 Honda S2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 699 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Honda S2000. (220 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 2009 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Honda S2000.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Honda S2000 | 2009 Koenigsegg CCX | |
Make | Honda | Koenigsegg |
Model | S2000 | CCX |
Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2157 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 806 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 919 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.1:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 18 L/100km |