2007 Hummer H3 vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2007 Hummer H3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (5 cylinders), 2007 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Hummer H3 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2.
Because 2007 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Hummer H3 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Hummer H3 | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Hummer | Mazda |
Model | H3 | 2 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |