2007 Hummer H3 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-05
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-05 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Hummer H3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Hummer H3 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (5 cylinders), 2007 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Hummer H3 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-05. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-05.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Hummer H3 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-05. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-05. 2013 Mazda CX-05 has automatic transmission and 2007 Hummer H3 has manual transmission. 2007 Hummer H3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-05 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Hummer H3 | 2013 Mazda CX-05 | |
Make | Hummer | Mazda |
Model | H3 | CX-05 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 58 L |