2007 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2007 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2007 Hyundai Matrix. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2007 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 200 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Hyundai Matrix (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Hyundai Matrix | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Hyundai | Triumph |
Model | Matrix | 2000 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |