2007 Isuzu I-290 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Isuzu I-290. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Isuzu I-290 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2007 Isuzu I-290. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2007 Isuzu I-290.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Isuzu I-290. (258 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Isuzu I-290. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2007 Isuzu I-290 has manual transmission. 2007 Isuzu I-290 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Isuzu I-290 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | I-290 | XF |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |