2007 Isuzu I-290 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Isuzu I-290. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Isuzu I-290 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 371 more horse power than 2007 Isuzu I-290. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2007 Isuzu I-290.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 488 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Isuzu I-290. (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Isuzu I-290.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Isuzu I-290 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Isuzu | Cadillac |
Model | I-290 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 746 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |