2007 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2005 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2007 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2007 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mariner.
Because 2007 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mercury Mariner. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Isuzu I-350 (329 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (206 Nm). This means 2007 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mariner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Isuzu I-350 | 2005 Mercury Mariner | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mercury |
| Model | I-350 | Mariner |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 329 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 62 L |
