2007 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2008 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2008 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Lincoln MKZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Lincoln MKZ (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2007 Isuzu I-350. (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Lincoln MKZ should accelerate faster than 2007 Isuzu I-350.
Because 2007 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Lincoln MKZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Lincoln MKZ (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Isuzu I-350. (329 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2008 Lincoln MKZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Isuzu I-350 | 2008 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Isuzu | Lincoln |
| Model | I-350 | MKZ |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 329 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 66 L |
